Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs Steyr 650
Image not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
SteyrSteyr 650
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +34 hp (+68%)Farmall 9084 hp
65050 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; 650 is in the 45th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +82 ci (+43%)Farmall 90274 ci
650192 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; 650 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 904
6504
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; 650 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 650 higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9012
65016
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; 650 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)650 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Steyr 650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steyr | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | 650 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Steyr 650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | Steyr | — |
| Model | FPT | WD 408.81 | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 50hp | ▲ Farmall 90+34 hp · +68% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 90+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 192ci | ▲ Farmall 90+82 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ Farmall 90+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 3.9in | ▲ Farmall 90+1.3 in · +33% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Steyr 650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Steyr 650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Height | 101in | 64.6in | ▲ Farmall 90+36.4 in · +56% |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 5,358lb | ▲ Farmall 90+344 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Steyr 650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Mechanical | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Steyr 650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Mechanical | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Steyr 650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 45th percentile (50 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 51st percentile (192 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,358 lb)
A · Farmall 90B · 650Median Utility Tractor