Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 95
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 95 vs John Deere 5725
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 5725
Utility
- power
- 89 hp
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 5725
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 95 higher · +1 hp (+1%)Farmall 9590 hp
572589 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 95 is in the 78th percentile; 5725 is in the 77th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5725 higher · +4 ci (+1%)Farmall 95274 ci
5725278 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 95 is in the 79th percentile; 5725 is in the 82nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 954
57254
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 95 is in the 50th percentile; 5725 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 95 higher · +3 (+33%)Farmall 9512
57259
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 95 is in the 50th percentile; 5725 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
Farmall 95 (A)5725 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Farmall 95 | 5725 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | John Deere | — |
| Power Output | 90hp | 89hp | ▲ Farmall 95+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ Farmall 95+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 278ci | ▲ 5725+4 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 5725+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Farmall 95+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 82.6in | — |
| Height | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,107lb | 5,512lb | ▲ Farmall 95+595 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4x24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4x30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type 2 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | John Deere 5725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 78th percentile (90 hp)B · 77th percentile (89 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 82nd percentile (278 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,107 lb)B · 52nd percentile (5,512 lb)
A · Farmall 95B · 5725Median Utility Tractor