Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 95C
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 95C vs McCormick Intl C100 Max
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl C100 Max
Utility
- power
- 92.5 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95C
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl C100 Max
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 95C higher · +2.5 hp (+3%)Farmall 95C95 hp
C100 Max92.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 95C is in the 81st percentile; C100 Max is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 95C higher · +5 ci (+2%)Farmall 95C274 ci
C100 Max269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 95C is in the 79th percentile; C100 Max is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 95C4
C100 Max4
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 95C is in the 50th percentile; C100 Max is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ C100 Max higher · +8 (+50%)Farmall 95C16
C100 Max24
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 95C is in the 73rd percentile; C100 Max is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Farmall 95C (A)C100 Max (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | Farmall 95C | C100 Max | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 92.5hp | ▲ Farmall 95C+2.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 1,400RPM | ▲ Farmall 95C+900 RPM · +64% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 269ci | ▲ Farmall 95C+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Farmall 95C+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed mechanical shuttle | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 163in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 80.1in | — |
| Height | 77.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,180lb | 7,341lb | ▲ C100 Max+161 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | McCormick Intl C100 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 69th percentile (7,180 lb)B · 70th percentile (7,341 lb)
A · Farmall 95CB · C100 MaxMedian Utility Tractor