Head to head · Utility

CaseIH Farmall DX18E vs Mitsubishi GSK18

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Farmall DX18E

Utility

power
18 hp
displacement
58.2 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Farmall DX18E specs
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B

Mitsubishi GSK18

Crawler

power
17.7 hp
displacement
61.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
6
Full GSK18 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX18E
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GSK18

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 5,1075,720

Engine Power

▲ Farmall DX18E higher · +0.3 hp (+2%)
Farmall DX18E18 hp
GSK1817.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Farmall DX18E is in the 6th percentile; GSK18 is in the 5th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ GSK18 higher · +3.2 ci (+5%)
Farmall DX18E58.2 ci
GSK1861.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Farmall DX18E is in the 5th percentile; GSK18 is in the 7th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Farmall DX18E3
GSK183
Median Utility Tractor4

Farmall DX18E is in the 23rd percentile; GSK18 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ GSK18 higher · +736 lb (+56%)
Farmall DX18E1,314 lb
GSK182,050 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

Farmall DX18E is in the 3rd percentile; GSK18 is in the 13th · 5,107 models

Farmall DX18E (A)GSK18 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHMitsubishi
ModelFarmall DX18EGSK18
CategoryUtility, Sub-CompactCrawler

Engine

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
ManufacturerShibauraIsuzu
ModelISM-S753E3100
Power Output18hp17.7hpFarmall DX18E+0.3 hp · +2%
Rated RPM3,000RPM2,500RPMFarmall DX18E+500 RPM · +20%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement58.2ci61.4ciGSK18+3.2 ci · +5%
Bore3in2.9inFarmall DX18E+0.1 in · +3%
Stroke2.8in3.1inGSK18+0.3 in · +11%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
TypeHydrostaticNot recorded

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
LengthNot recorded104in
WidthNot recorded49.6in
HeightNot recorded72.8in
Operating Weight1,314lb2,050lbGSK18+736 lb · +56%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
System TypeOpen centerNot recorded
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower

Tires

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded6.00-12

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedJIS0
Hitch CategoryINot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDHalf-track
Drive Type4WDNot recorded
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Farmall DX18EMitsubishi GSK18Difference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 6th percentile (18 hp)B · 5th percentile (17.7 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 3rd percentile (1,314 lb)B · 13th percentile (2,050 lb)
A · Farmall DX18EB · GSK18Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Farmall DX18EFull spec pageMitsubishi GSK18