Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall DX18E
Utility
- power
- 18 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall DX18E vs Mitsubishi MT18
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT18
Utility
- power
- 17.8 hp
- displacement
- 64.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX18E
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT18
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall DX18E higher · +0.2 hp (+1%)Farmall DX18E18 hp
MT1817.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall DX18E is in the 6th percentile; MT18 is in the 6th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT18 higher · +6.6 ci (+11%)Farmall DX18E58.2 ci
MT1864.8 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall DX18E is in the 5th percentile; MT18 is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall DX18E3
MT183
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall DX18E is in the 23rd percentile; MT18 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Farmall DX18E (A)MT18 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi MT18 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Farmall DX18E | MT18 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi MT18 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | ISM-S753 | K3E | — |
| Power Output | 18hp | 17.8hp | ▲ Farmall DX18E+0.2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 64.8ci | ▲ MT18+6.6 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 2.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi MT18 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi MT18 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 1,314lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi MT18 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi MT18 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi MT18 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi MT18 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | 12V | Same |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 6th percentile (18 hp)B · 6th percentile (17.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 8th percentile (64.8 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · Farmall DX18EB · MT18Median Utility Tractor