Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall DX18E
Utility
- power
- 18 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Utility

Sub-Compact
How they compare
Farmall DX18E is in the 18th percentile; F180D is in the 18th · 816 models
Farmall DX18E is in the 17th percentile; F180D is in the 34th · 757 models
Farmall DX18E is in the 50th percentile; F180D is in the 50th · 802 models
Full comparison
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Yanmar F180D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Farmall DX18E | F180D | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Yanmar F180D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | ISM-S753 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 18hp | 18hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ Farmall DX18E+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 69.9ci | ▲ F180D+11.7 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 2.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Yanmar F180D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Yanmar F180D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 1,314lb | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Yanmar F180D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Yanmar F180D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Yanmar F180D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Yanmar F180D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context