CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall DX22E
Utility
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall DX22E vs New Holland TZ24D
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TZ24D
Utility
- power
- 24 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX22E
vs
New HollandNew Holland TZ24D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TZ24D higher · +2 hp (+9%)Farmall DX22E22 hp
TZ24D24 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall DX22E is in the 11th percentile; TZ24D is in the 14th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TZ24D higher · +3.1 ci (+5%)Farmall DX22E58.2 ci
TZ24D61.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall DX22E is in the 5th percentile; TZ24D is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall DX22E3
TZ24D3
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall DX22E is in the 23rd percentile; TZ24D is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ TZ24D higher · +146 lb (+11%)Farmall DX22E1,314 lb
TZ24D1,460 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall DX22E is in the 3rd percentile; TZ24D is in the 5th · 5,107 models
Farmall DX22E (A)TZ24D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Farmall DX22E | TZ24D | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | ISM-S753 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 22hp | 24hp | ▲ TZ24D+2 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 61.3ci | ▲ TZ24D+3.1 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 3in | 3in | Same |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 2.8in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 80.6in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 46.5in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 89.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,314lb | 1,460lb | ▲ TZ24D+146 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 11th percentile (22 hp)B · 14th percentile (24 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 3rd percentile (1,314 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,460 lb)
A · Farmall DX22EB · TZ24DMedian Utility Tractor