Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall DX25E
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall DX25E vs New Holland Boomer 1030
New HollandModel B
New Holland Boomer 1030
Utility
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 69 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX25E
vs
New HollandNew Holland Boomer 1030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Boomer 1030 higher · +3 hp (+12%)Farmall DX25E25 hp
Boomer 103028 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall DX25E is in the 16th percentile; Boomer 1030 is in the 20th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Boomer 1030 higher · +7.7 ci (+13%)Farmall DX25E61.3 ci
Boomer 103069 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall DX25E is in the 7th percentile; Boomer 1030 is in the 10th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall DX25E3
Boomer 10303
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall DX25E is in the 23rd percentile; Boomer 1030 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Boomer 1030 higher · +169 lb (+13%)Farmall DX25E1,323 lb
Boomer 10301,492 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall DX25E is in the 3rd percentile; Boomer 1030 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
Farmall DX25E (A)Boomer 1030 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Farmall DX25E | Boomer 1030 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | ISM-S773 | S773L | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 28hp | ▲ Boomer 1030+3 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,100RPM | ▲ Boomer 1030+100 RPM · +3% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 61.3ci | 69ci | ▲ Boomer 1030+7.7 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 2.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 98.5in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 52in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 76in | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,323lb | 1,492lb | ▲ Boomer 1030+169 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.1gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | New Holland Boomer 1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 20th percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)B · 10th percentile (69 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 3rd percentile (1,323 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,492 lb)
A · Farmall DX25EB · Boomer 1030Median Utility Tractor