Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH JX1075C
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 179 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH JX1075C vs New Holland T4030F
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T4030F
Utility
- power
- 76 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH JX1075C
vs
New HollandNew Holland T4030F
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T4030F higher · +1 hp (+1%)JX1075C75 hp
T4030F76 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
JX1075C is in the 68th percentile; T4030F is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T4030F higher · +16 ci (+9%)JX1075C179 ci
T4030F195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
JX1075C is in the 47th percentile; T4030F is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ T4030F higher · +1 (+33%)JX1075C3
T4030F4
Median Utility Tractor4
JX1075C is in the 23rd percentile; T4030F is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedJX1075C16
T4030F16
Median Utility Tractor12
JX1075C is in the 73rd percentile; T4030F is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
JX1075C (A)T4030F (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | JX1075C | T4030F | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | New Holland | — |
| Model | Not recorded | F5C | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 76hp | ▲ T4030F+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,300RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ T4030F+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 179ci | 195ci | ▲ T4030F+16 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | mechanical shuttle | Mechanical Shuttle (Synchro Command) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 156in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 69.6in | 58.5in | ▲ JX1075C+11.1 in · +19% |
| Height | 95.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 83.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,085lb | 6,089lb | ▲ T4030F+4 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | 12 volt | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH JX1075C | New Holland T4030F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 68th percentile (75 hp)B · 69th percentile (76 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 47th percentile (179 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,085 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,089 lb)
A · JX1075CB · T4030FMedian Utility Tractor