Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH JX1095N
Agricultural
- power
- 91 hp
- displacement
- 238 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
CaseIH JX1095N vs Ursus 6824 Mido
Image not recorded
UrsusModel B
Ursus 6824 Mido
Agricultural
- power
- 91.2 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH JX1095N
vs
UrsusUrsus 6824 Mido
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 6824 Mido higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)JX1095N91 hp
6824 Mido91.2 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
JX1095N is in the 36th percentile; 6824 Mido is in the 37th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6824 Mido higher · +30 ci (+13%)JX1095N238 ci
6824 Mido268 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
JX1095N is in the 23rd percentile; 6824 Mido is in the 37th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedJX1095N4
6824 Mido4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
JX1095N is in the 31st percentile; 6824 Mido is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ JX1095N higher · +4 (+33%)JX1095N16
6824 Mido12
Median Agricultural Tractor16
JX1095N is in the 50th percentile; 6824 Mido is in the 33rd · 972 models
JX1095N (A)6824 Mido (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ursus | — |
| Model | JX1095N | 6824 Mido | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case IH | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 91hp | 91.2hp | ▲ 6824 Mido+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 238ci | 268ci | ▲ 6824 Mido+30 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 6824 Mido+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 6824 Mido+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 158in | 154in | ▲ JX1095N+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 53.4in | 86.6in | ▲ 6824 Mido+33.2 in · +62% |
| Height | 91.6in | 106in | ▲ 6824 Mido+14.4 in · +16% |
| Operating Weight | 5,820lb | 8,609lb | ▲ 6824 Mido+2,789 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH JX1095N | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 36th percentile (91 hp)B · 37th percentile (91.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 23rd percentile (238 ci)B · 37th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 33rd percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 19th percentile (5,820 lb)B · 37th percentile (8,609 lb)
A · JX1095NB · 6824 MidoMedian Agricultural Tractor