Head to head · Utility
CaseIH JX90 vs Ford 5640
CaseIHCaseIH JX90
vs
FordFord 5640
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ JX90 higher · +3.3 hp (+4%)JX9082 hp
564078.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
JX90 is in the 73rd percentile; 5640 is in the 70th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5640 higher · +29 ci (+12%)JX90239 ci
5640268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
JX90 is in the 65th percentile; 5640 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedJX904
56404
Median Utility Tractor4
JX90 is in the 50th percentile; 5640 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ JX90 higher · +4 (+50%)JX9012
56408
Median Utility Tractor12
JX90 is in the 50th percentile; 5640 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
JX90 (A)5640 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ford | — |
| Model | JX90 | 5640 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | Ford | — |
| Model | 8045.25 | Genesis | — |
| Power Output | 82hp | 78.7hp | ▲ JX90+3.3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ JX90+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 239ci | 268ci | ▲ 5640+29 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 5640+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ JX90+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-Speed Mechanical Shuttle | Constant mesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 159in | 162in | ▲ 5640+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 71.2in | 77in | ▲ 5640+5.8 in · +8% |
| Height | 101in | 107in | ▲ 5640+6 in · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent w/ mechanical dry disc clutch | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 3 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 5,025lb | 4,200lb | ▲ JX90+825 lb · +20% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Mechanical | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | Ford 5640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS or Cab (optional) | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (82 hp)B · 70th percentile (78.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 65th percentile (239 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Length
median 137 inA · 76th percentile (159 in)B · 79th percentile (162 in)
A · JX90B · 5640Median Utility Tractor