Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH JXU 95
Utility
- power
- 95.2 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH JXU 95 vs McCormick Intl X60.20
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X60.20
Utility
- power
- 92.5 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 48
CaseIHCaseIH JXU 95
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X60.20
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ JXU 95 higher · +2.7 hp (+3%)JXU 9595.2 hp
X60.2092.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
JXU 95 is in the 81st percentile; X60.20 is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ JXU 95 higher · +5 ci (+2%)JXU 95274 ci
X60.20269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
JXU 95 is in the 79th percentile; X60.20 is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedJXU 954
X60.204
Median Utility Tractor4
JXU 95 is in the 50th percentile; X60.20 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X60.20 higher · +36 (+300%)JXU 9512
X60.2048
Median Utility Tractor12
JXU 95 is in the 50th percentile; X60.20 is in the 99th · 4,941 models
JXU 95 (A)X60.20 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | JXU 95 | X60.20 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | Perkins | — |
| Model | NEF F4C | 1104D-44TA | — |
| Power Output | 95.2hp | 92.5hp | ▲ JXU 95+2.7 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 269ci | ▲ JXU 95+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ JXU 95+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 162in | 173in | ▲ X60.20+11 in · +7% |
| Width | Not recorded | 92.4in | — |
| Height | 103in | 108in | ▲ X60.20+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 9,369lb | 9,259lb | ▲ JXU 95+110 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 440/65R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 540/65R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-point hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | McCormick Intl X60.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95.2 hp)B · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 99th percentile (48)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 83rd percentile (9,369 lb)B · 83rd percentile (9,259 lb)
A · JXU 95B · X60.20Median Utility Tractor