CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Luxxum 100
Utility
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Luxxum 100 vs Fendt Farmer 309C
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt Farmer 309C
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 21
CaseIHCaseIH Luxxum 100
vs
FendtFendt Farmer 309C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Luxxum 100 higher · +4 hp (+4%)Luxxum 10099 hp
Farmer 309C95 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Luxxum 100 is in the 82nd percentile; Farmer 309C is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Luxxum 100 higher · +12 ci (+6%)Luxxum 100207 ci
Farmer 309C195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Luxxum 100 is in the 57th percentile; Farmer 309C is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedLuxxum 1004
Farmer 309C4
Median Utility Tractor4
Luxxum 100 is in the 50th percentile; Farmer 309C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Luxxum 100 higher · +11 (+52%)Luxxum 10032
Farmer 309C21
Median Utility Tractor12
Luxxum 100 is in the 97th percentile; Farmer 309C is in the 88th · 4,941 models
Luxxum 100 (A)Farmer 309C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Luxxum 100 | Farmer 309C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | MWM | — |
| Power Output | 99hp | 95hp | ▲ Luxxum 100+4 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ Farmer 309C+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 207ci | 195ci | ▲ Luxxum 100+12 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.7in | ▲ Luxxum 100+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.6in | ▲ Farmer 309C+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Four-speed power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 165in | 158in | ▲ Luxxum 100+7 in · +4% |
| Width | 82.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 107in | 106in | ▲ Luxxum 100+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 9,678lb | 9,305lb | ▲ Luxxum 100+373 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R34 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Stage IV | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Luxxum 100 | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (99 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 57th percentile (207 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 97th percentile (32)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 85th percentile (9,678 lb)B · 83rd percentile (9,305 lb)
A · Luxxum 100B · Farmer 309CMedian Utility Tractor