CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 200
Row Crop
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 200 vs Challenger 35
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 35
Crawler
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 200
vs
ChallengerChallenger 35
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 35 higher · +10 hp (+5%)Magnum 200200 hp
35210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 200 is in the 77th percentile; 35 is in the 79th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Magnum 200 higher · +8 ci (+2%)Magnum 200411 ci
35403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 200 is in the 60th percentile; 35 is in the 56th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 2006
356
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 200 is in the 50th percentile; 35 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 200 higher · +3 (+19%)Magnum 20019
3516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 200 is in the 68th percentile; 35 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Magnum 200 (A)35 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 200 | 35 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3116 | — |
| Power Output | 200hp | 210hp | ▲ 35+10 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Magnum 200+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 403ci | ▲ Magnum 200+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Magnum 200+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 234in | 211in | ▲ Magnum 200+23 in · +11% |
| Width | Not recorded | 91in | — |
| Height | 126in | 125in | ▲ Magnum 200+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 20,705lb | 22,262lb | ▲ 35+1,557 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensating | Variable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Differential Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Differential Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 8.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 200 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 77th percentile (200 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 56th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 86th percentile (20,705 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,262 lb)
A · Magnum 200B · 35Median Row Crop Tractor