Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Magnum 210 vs Challenger 35

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Magnum 210

Row Crop

power
210 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Magnum 210 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger 35

Crawler

power
210 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 35 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 210
vs
ChallengerChallenger 35

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,140–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Magnum 210210 hp
35210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Magnum 210 is in the 79th percentile; 35 is in the 79th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Magnum 210 higher · +8 ci (+2%)
Magnum 210411 ci
35403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Magnum 210 is in the 60th percentile; 35 is in the 56th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Magnum 2106
356
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Magnum 210 is in the 50th percentile; 35 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Magnum 210 higher · +2 (+13%)
Magnum 21018
3516
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Magnum 210 is in the 61st percentile; 35 is in the 50th · 1,200 models

Magnum 210 (A)35 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelMagnum 21035—
CategoryRow CropCrawler—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaterpillar—
ModelFPT3116—
Power Output210hp210hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ Magnum 210+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci403ci▲ Magnum 210+8 ci · +2%
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5in▲ Magnum 210+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull Power ShiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
LengthNot recorded211in—
WidthNot recorded91in—
Height129in125in▲ Magnum 210+4 in · +3%
Operating WeightNot recorded22,262lb—

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
System TypePressure Flow Compensated (PFC)Variable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensated—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerDifferential Power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
Hitch CategoryII/IIIIII/II—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerDifferential Power—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
Coolant4.3gal8.6gal▲ 35+4.3 gal · +100%

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Magnum 210Challenger 35Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 79th percentile (210 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 56th percentile (403 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)

Height

median 114 in
A · 88th percentile (129 in)B · 85th percentile (125 in)
A · Magnum 210B · 35Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Magnum 210Full spec pageChallenger 35