Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 315
Row Crop
- power
- 347 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 23
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 315 vs Challenger MT685C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT685C
Row Crop
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 315
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT685C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +7 hp (+2%)Magnum 315347 hp
MT685C340 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 315 is in the 96th percentile; MT685C is in the 96th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +18 ci (+4%)Magnum 315531 ci
MT685C513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 315 is in the 93rd percentile; MT685C is in the 90th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3156
MT685C6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 315 is in the 50th percentile; MT685C is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +3,550 lb (+15%)Magnum 31527,800 lb
MT685C24,250 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Magnum 315 is in the 97th percentile; MT685C is in the 93rd · 1,350 models
Magnum 315 (A)MT685C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 315 | MT685C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | AGCO | — |
| Model | Not recorded | SISU POWER 84CTA | — |
| Power Output | 347hp | 340hp | ▲ Magnum 315+7 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT685C+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 531ci | 513ci | ▲ Magnum 315+18 ci · +4% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously-variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 253in | 223in | ▲ Magnum 315+30 in · +13% |
| Width | 100in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 133in | 133in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 27,800lb | 24,250lb | ▲ Magnum 315+3,550 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III, IV | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 96th percentile (347 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 93rd percentile (531 ci)B · 90th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (27,800 lb)B · 93rd percentile (24,250 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 98th percentile (253 in)B · 92nd percentile (223 in)
A · Magnum 315B · MT685CMedian Row Crop Tractor