Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Magnum 315 vs Challenger MT765D

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Magnum 315

Row Crop

power
347 hp
displacement
531 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
23
Full Magnum 315 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765D

Agricultural

power
339 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765D specs
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 315
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765D

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

▲ Magnum 315 higher · +8 hp (+2%)
Magnum 315347 hp
MT765D339 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Magnum 315 is in the 96th percentile; MT765D is in the 95th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Magnum 315 higher · +18 ci (+4%)
Magnum 315531 ci
MT765D513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Magnum 315 is in the 93rd percentile; MT765D is in the 92nd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Magnum 3156
MT765D6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Magnum 315 is in the 50th percentile; MT765D is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Magnum 315 higher · +7 (+44%)
Magnum 31523
MT765D16
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Magnum 315 is in the 74th percentile; MT765D is in the 50th · 1,200 models

Magnum 315 (A)MT765D (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelMagnum 315MT765D—
CategoryRow CropAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
ManufacturerFPTAGCO POWER—
Power Output347hp339hp▲ Magnum 315+8 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,000RPM2,100RPM▲ MT765D+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement531ci513ci▲ Magnum 315+18 ci · +4%
BoreNot recorded4.4in—
StrokeNot recorded5.7in—

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
Length253inNot recorded—
Width100inNot recorded—
Height133inNot recorded—
Operating Weight27,800lb30,880lb▲ MT765D+3,080 lb · +11%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
System TypeNot recordedClosed-center pressure-flow compensated (PFC)—
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded59.6gpm—
PressureNot recorded2,964psi—
Steering TypePowerElectro-hydraulic differential—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
Power RatingNot recorded339hp—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII/IIIN—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerElectro-hydraulic differential—
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Magnum 315Challenger MT765DDifference
StandardNot recordedInterim Tier IV—
Control SystemNot recordedselective catalytic reduction (SCR)—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 96th percentile (347 hp)B · 95th percentile (339 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 93rd percentile (531 ci)B · 92nd percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 74th percentile (23)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 97th percentile (27,800 lb)B · 98th percentile (30,880 lb)
A · Magnum 315B · MT765DMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Magnum 315Full spec pageChallenger MT765D