Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 315
Row Crop
- power
- 347 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 23
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 315 vs Challenger MT835B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT835B
Articulated
- power
- 350 hp
- displacement
- 928 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 315
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ MT835B higher · +3 hp (<1%)Magnum 315347 hp
MT835B350 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 315 is in the 96th percentile; MT835B is in the 97th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT835B higher · +397 ci (+75%)Magnum 315531 ci
MT835B928 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 315 is in the 93rd percentile; MT835B is in the 99th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3156
MT835B6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 315 is in the 50th percentile; MT835B is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +7 (+44%)Magnum 31523
MT835B16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 315 is in the 74th percentile; MT835B is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Magnum 315 (A)MT835B (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 315 | MT835B | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C15 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 347hp | 350hp | ▲ MT835B+3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 1,851RPM | ▲ Magnum 315+149 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 531ci | 928ci | ▲ MT835B+397 ci · +75% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 5.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 6.8in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 253in | 266in | ▲ MT835B+13 in · +5% |
| Width | 100in | 141in | ▲ MT835B+41 in · +41% |
| Height | 133in | 138in | ▲ MT835B+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 27,800lb | 43,420lb | ▲ MT835B+15,620 lb · +56% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center PFC | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Electro-hydraulic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Optional | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Electro-hydraulic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volts | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 96th percentile (347 hp)B · 97th percentile (350 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 93rd percentile (531 ci)B · 99th percentile (928 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 74th percentile (23)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (27,800 lb)B · 99th percentile (43,420 lb)
A · Magnum 315B · MT835BMedian Row Crop Tractor