Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 315
Row Crop
- power
- 347 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 23
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 315 vs Claas Challenger 75E
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Challenger 75E
Crawler
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 315
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 75E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +7 hp (+2%)Magnum 315347 hp
Challenger 75E340 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 315 is in the 96th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 96th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 75E higher · +98 ci (+18%)Magnum 315531 ci
Challenger 75E629 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 315 is in the 93rd percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3156
Challenger 75E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 315 is in the 50th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +13 (+130%)Magnum 31523
Challenger 75E10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 315 is in the 74th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Magnum 315 (A)Challenger 75E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | Magnum 315 | Challenger 75E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 347hp | 340hp | ▲ Magnum 315+7 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Challenger 75E+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 531ci | 629ci | ▲ Challenger 75E+98 ci · +18% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 253in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 100in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 133in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 27,800lb | 34,800lb | ▲ Challenger 75E+7,000 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III,IV | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter (12 volts) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 15gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 96th percentile (347 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 93rd percentile (531 ci)B · 98th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 74th percentile (23)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (27,800 lb)B · 99th percentile (34,800 lb)
A · Magnum 315B · Challenger 75EMedian Row Crop Tractor