Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Maxxum 140
Row Crop
- power
- 139 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Maxxum 140 vs CaseIH Puma 145
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 145
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH Maxxum 140
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 145 higher · +7 hp (+5%)Maxxum 140139 hp
Puma 145146 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Maxxum 140 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 55th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMaxxum 140411 ci
Puma 145411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Maxxum 140 is in the 63rd percentile; Puma 145 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMaxxum 1406
Puma 1456
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Maxxum 140 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 145 higher · +2 (+13%)Maxxum 14016
Puma 14518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Maxxum 140 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
Maxxum 140 (A)Puma 145 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | Maxxum 140 | Puma 145 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | FPT | Same |
| Power Output | 139hp | 146hp | ▲ Puma 145+7 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial Power Shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 61.4in | — |
| Height | 114in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,180lb | 14,350lb | ▲ Puma 145+2,170 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center PFC | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: 2/3N | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Electro-hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 140 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 50th percentile (139 hp)B · 55th percentile (146 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 50th percentile (12,180 lb)B · 63rd percentile (14,350 lb)
A · Maxxum 140B · Puma 145Median Row Crop Tractor