Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH MX210 Magnum
Row Crop
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH MX210 Magnum vs Challenger 35
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 35
Crawler
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH MX210 Magnum
vs
ChallengerChallenger 35
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 35 higher · +10 hp (+5%)MX210 Magnum200 hp
35210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
MX210 Magnum is in the 77th percentile; 35 is in the 79th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MX210 Magnum higher · +102 ci (+25%)MX210 Magnum505 ci
35403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
MX210 Magnum is in the 87th percentile; 35 is in the 56th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMX210 Magnum6
356
Median Row Crop Tractor6
MX210 Magnum is in the 50th percentile; 35 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ MX210 Magnum higher · +2 (+13%)MX210 Magnum18
3516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
MX210 Magnum is in the 61st percentile; 35 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
MX210 Magnum (A)35 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | MX210 Magnum | 35 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3116 | — |
| Power Output | 200hp | 210hp | ▲ 35+10 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 35+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 403ci | ▲ MX210 Magnum+102 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ MX210 Magnum+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ MX210 Magnum+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 211in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91in | — |
| Height | 125in | 125in | Same |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 22,262lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) with parallel priority | Variable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Differential Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Differential Power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6gal | 8.6gal | ▲ 35+2.6 gal · +43% |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH MX210 Magnum | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 77th percentile (200 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 56th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Height
median 114 inA · 84th percentile (125 in)B · 85th percentile (125 in)
A · MX210 MagnumB · 35Median Row Crop Tractor