CaseIHModel A
CaseIH MXU100
Utility
- power
- 100 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH MXU100 vs Steyr 9105MT
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr 9105MT
Utility
- power
- 101 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH MXU100
vs
SteyrSteyr 9105MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9105MT higher · +1 hp (+1%)MXU100100 hp
9105MT101 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MXU100 is in the 84th percentile; 9105MT is in the 84th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MXU100 higher · +6 ci (+2%)MXU100274 ci
9105MT268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MXU100 is in the 79th percentile; 9105MT is in the 76th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMXU1004
9105MT4
Median Utility Tractor4
MXU100 is in the 50th percentile; 9105MT is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MXU100 higher · +8 (+50%)MXU10024
9105MT16
Median Utility Tractor12
MXU100 is in the 92nd percentile; 9105MT is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
MXU100 (A)9105MT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steyr | — |
| Model | MXU100 | 9105MT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Sisu | — |
| Power Output | 100hp | 101hp | ▲ 9105MT+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 9105MT+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 268ci | ▲ MXU100+6 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 9105MT+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ MXU100+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial Powershift | Power-2 | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 166in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 85.4in | — |
| Height | 112in | 108in | ▲ MXU100+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 9,060lb | 9,215lb | ▲ 9105MT+155 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure-flow compensated (optional) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 7.50x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9x38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier III | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH MXU100 | Steyr 9105MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS / Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (100 hp)B · 84th percentile (101 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 76th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 82nd percentile (9,060 lb)B · 83rd percentile (9,215 lb)
A · MXU100B · 9105MTMedian Utility Tractor