Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH MXU115 Value
Utility
- power
- 116 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH MXU115 Value vs Ford 9030
FordModel B
Ford 9030
Utility
- power
- 116 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH MXU115 Value
vs
FordFord 9030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMXU115 Value116 hp
9030116 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MXU115 Value is in the 89th percentile; 9030 is in the 89th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MXU115 Value higher · +143 ci (+53%)MXU115 Value411 ci
9030268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MXU115 Value is in the 91st percentile; 9030 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MXU115 Value higher · +2 (+50%)MXU115 Value6
90304
Median Utility Tractor4
MXU115 Value is in the 93rd percentile; 9030 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
MXU115 Value (A)9030 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ford | — |
| Model | MXU115 Value | 9030 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Ford | — |
| Model | Not recorded | BSD444T | — |
| Power Output | 116hp | 116hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 9030+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ MXU115 Value+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 411ci | 268ci | ▲ MXU115 Value+143 ci · +53% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 9030+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.4in | ▲ MXU115 Value+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh and Partial Powershift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 180in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.3in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 117in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 10,150lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed-center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Articulated Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Articulated Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH MXU115 Value | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 89th percentile (116 hp)B · 89th percentile (116 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 91st percentile (411 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · MXU115 ValueB · 9030Median Utility Tractor