CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Optum 300
Row Crop
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Optum 300 vs Challenger 65D
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65D
Crawler
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 636 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Optum 300
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedOptum 300300 hp
65D300 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Optum 300 is in the 93rd percentile; 65D is in the 93rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65D higher · +225 ci (+55%)Optum 300411 ci
65D636 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Optum 300 is in the 60th percentile; 65D is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedOptum 3006
65D6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Optum 300 is in the 50th percentile; 65D is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65D higher · +12,086 lb (+52%)Optum 30023,149 lb
65D35,235 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Optum 300 is in the 92nd percentile; 65D is in the 99th · 1,350 models
Optum 300 (A)65D (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Optum 300 | 65D | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 300hp | 300hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 636ci | ▲ 65D+225 ci · +55% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.8in | ▲ 65D+0.7 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 6in | ▲ 65D+0.8 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 208in | 232in | ▲ 65D+24 in · +12% |
| Width | 119in | 120in | ▲ 65D+1 in · <1% |
| Height | 133in | 144in | ▲ 65D+11 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 23,149lb | 35,235lb | ▲ 65D+12,086 lb · +52% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed-center pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 93rd percentile (300 hp)B · 93rd percentile (300 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 98th percentile (636 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 92nd percentile (23,149 lb)B · 99th percentile (35,235 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 83rd percentile (208 in)B · 94th percentile (232 in)
A · Optum 300B · 65DMedian Row Crop Tractor