CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Optum 300
Row Crop
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Optum 300 vs Fendt 930 Vario
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 930 Vario
Row Crop
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Optum 300
vs
FendtFendt 930 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedOptum 300300 hp
930 Vario300 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Optum 300 is in the 93rd percentile; 930 Vario is in the 93rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 930 Vario higher · +8 ci (+2%)Optum 300411 ci
930 Vario419 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Optum 300 is in the 60th percentile; 930 Vario is in the 71st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedOptum 3006
930 Vario6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Optum 300 is in the 50th percentile; 930 Vario is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Optum 300 higher · +3,418 lb (+17%)Optum 30023,149 lb
930 Vario19,731 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Optum 300 is in the 92nd percentile; 930 Vario is in the 84th · 1,350 models
Optum 300 (A)930 Vario (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Optum 300 | 930 Vario | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | MAN | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D0836 | — |
| Power Output | 300hp | 300hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 930 Vario+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 419ci | ▲ 930 Vario+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 930 Vario+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ Optum 300+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 208in | 195in | ▲ Optum 300+13 in · +7% |
| Width | 119in | 106in | ▲ Optum 300+13 in · +12% |
| Height | 133in | 122in | ▲ Optum 300+11 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 23,149lb | 19,731lb | ▲ Optum 300+3,418 lb · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 30,865lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Optum 300 | Fendt 930 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 93rd percentile (300 hp)B · 93rd percentile (300 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 71st percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 92nd percentile (23,149 lb)B · 84th percentile (19,731 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 83rd percentile (208 in)B · 69th percentile (195 in)
A · Optum 300B · 930 VarioMedian Row Crop Tractor