CaseIHModel A
CaseIH PJ75
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH PJ75 vs Kubota M5091
KubotaModel B
Kubota M5091
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
CaseIHCaseIH PJ75
vs
KubotaKubota M5091
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPJ7575 hp
M509175 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
PJ75 is in the 68th percentile; M5091 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ PJ75 higher · +14 ci (+6%)PJ75244 ci
M5091230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
PJ75 is in the 69th percentile; M5091 is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPJ754
M50914
Median Utility Tractor4
PJ75 is in the 50th percentile; M5091 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ M5091 higher · +1,863 lb (+33%)PJ755,677 lb
M50917,540 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
PJ75 is in the 53rd percentile; M5091 is in the 72nd · 5,107 models
PJ75 (A)M5091 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Kubota | — |
| Model | PJ75 | M5091 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V3800 | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 75hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,350RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M5091+250 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 230ci | ▲ PJ75+14 ci · +6% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh, Two-Speed Power Shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 159in | — |
| Width | 69.8in | 86.2in | ▲ M5091+16.4 in · +23% |
| Height | 84.2in | 104in | ▲ M5091+19.8 in · +24% |
| Operating Weight | 5,677lb | 7,540lb | ▲ M5091+1,863 lb · +33% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 28x14.96 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 9,041lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH PJ75 | Kubota M5091 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 68th percentile (75 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 53rd percentile (5,677 lb)B · 72nd percentile (7,540 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 60th percentile (69.8 in)B · 89th percentile (86.2 in)
A · PJ75B · M5091Median Utility Tractor