Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 125
Utility
- power
- 125 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Puma 125 vs New Holland TN85A
New HollandModel B
New Holland TN85A
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 125
vs
New HollandNew Holland TN85A
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Puma 125 higher · +45 hp (+56%)Puma 125125 hp
TN85A80 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Puma 125 is in the 90th percentile; TN85A is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 125 higher · +137 ci (+50%)Puma 125411 ci
TN85A274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Puma 125 is in the 91st percentile; TN85A is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Puma 125 higher · +2 (+50%)Puma 1256
TN85A4
Median Utility Tractor4
Puma 125 is in the 93rd percentile; TN85A is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 125 higher · +6 (+50%)Puma 12518
TN85A12
Median Utility Tractor12
Puma 125 is in the 83rd percentile; TN85A is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Puma 125 (A)TN85A (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 125 | TN85A | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Iveco | — |
| Power Output | 125hp | 80hp | ▲ Puma 125+45 hp · +56% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TN85A+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ Puma 125+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 411ci | 274ci | ▲ Puma 125+137 ci · +50% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed partial power shift | Partially synchronized with mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 158in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 67.2in | — |
| Height | 118in | 95.1in | ▲ Puma 125+22.9 in · +24% |
| Operating Weight | 13,260lb | 6,008lb | ▲ Puma 125+7,252 lb · +121% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,968lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 125 | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 90th percentile (125 hp)B · 71st percentile (80 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 91st percentile (411 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 92nd percentile (13,260 lb)B · 57th percentile (6,008 lb)
A · Puma 125B · TN85AMedian Utility Tractor