Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 130
Row Crop
- power
- 131 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 130 vs New Holland T6.160
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T6.160
Row Crop
- power
- 131 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 130
vs
New HollandNew Holland T6.160
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 130131 hp
T6.160131 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 130 is in the 46th percentile; T6.160 is in the 46th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 130 higher · +137 ci (+50%)Puma 130411 ci
T6.160274 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 130 is in the 60th percentile; T6.160 is in the 24th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ Puma 130 higher · +2 (+50%)Puma 1306
T6.1604
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 130 is in the 50th percentile; T6.160 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Puma 130 higher · +2,819 lb (+26%)Puma 13013,600 lb
T6.16010,781 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 130 is in the 60th percentile; T6.160 is in the 37th · 1,350 models
Puma 130 (A)T6.160 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 130 | T6.160 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | FPT | Same |
| Power Output | 131hp | 131hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ Puma 130+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 411ci | 274ci | ▲ Puma 130+137 ci · +50% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 169in | — |
| Width | 61.4in | 89.8in | ▲ T6.160+28.4 in · +46% |
| Height | Not recorded | 110in | — |
| Operating Weight | 13,600lb | 10,781lb | ▲ Puma 130+2,819 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Category | 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | SCR | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | New Holland T6.160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 46th percentile (131 hp)B · 46th percentile (131 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 24th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 60th percentile (13,600 lb)B · 37th percentile (10,781 lb)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 3rd percentile (61.4 in)B · 47th percentile (89.8 in)
A · Puma 130B · T6.160Median Row Crop Tractor