Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 130
Row Crop
- power
- 131 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 130 vs Oliver 2150
OliverModel B
Oliver 2150
Row Crop
- power
- 131 hp
- displacement
- 478 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 130
vs
OliverOliver 2150
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 130131 hp
2150131 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 130 is in the 46th percentile; 2150 is in the 46th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2150 higher · +67 ci (+16%)Puma 130411 ci
2150478 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 130 is in the 60th percentile; 2150 is in the 83rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1306
21506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 130 is in the 50th percentile; 2150 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedPuma 13018
215018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 130 is in the 61st percentile; 2150 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
Puma 130 (A)2150 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Oliver | — |
| Model | Puma 130 | 2150 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Oliver-Hercules | — |
| Power Output | 131hp | 131hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 2150+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 478ci | ▲ 2150+67 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.6in | ▲ 2150+0.5 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ Puma 130+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 162in | — |
| Width | 61.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 85.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | 13,600lb | 12,985lb | ▲ Puma 130+615 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | 2/3N | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 6,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Independent dry disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 130 | Oliver 2150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open or Cab (optional) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 46th percentile (131 hp)B · 46th percentile (131 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 83rd percentile (478 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 60th percentile (13,600 lb)B · 55th percentile (12,985 lb)
A · Puma 130B · 2150Median Row Crop Tractor