Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 145 vs Ford 9700

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 145

Row Crop

power
146 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 145 specs
Image not recorded
FordModel B

Ford 9700

Row Crop

power
146 hp
displacement
401 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 9700 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 145
vs
FordFord 9700

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 806–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 145146 hp
9700146 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 145 is in the 55th percentile; 9700 is in the 55th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 145 higher · +10 ci (+2%)
Puma 145411 ci
9700401 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 145 is in the 60th percentile; 9700 is in the 51st · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1456
97006
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 145 is in the 50th percentile; 9700 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 145 higher · +2 (+13%)
Puma 14518
970016
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 145 is in the 61st percentile; 9700 is in the 50th · 1,200 models

Puma 145 (A)9700 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHFord—
ModelPuma 1459700—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
ManufacturerFPTFord—
ModelNot recordedFord—
Power Output146hp146hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci401ci▲ Puma 145+10 ci · +2%
Bore4.1in4.4in▲ 9700+0.3 in · +7%
Stroke5.2in4.4in▲ Puma 145+0.8 in · +18%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
TypeFull power shiftGear with dry disc clutch—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
LengthNot recorded180in—
Width61.4in79.2in▲ 9700+17.8 in · +29%
HeightNot recorded119in—
Operating Weight14,350lb12,860lb▲ Puma 145+1,490 lb · +12%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Open center—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
TypeNot recorded540/1000—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
Hitch Type2/3NThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—
Brake TypeElectro-hydraulic wet discHydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
StandardInterim Tier 4Not recorded—
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
CoolantNot recorded5.5gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 145Ford 9700Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 55th percentile (146 hp)B · 55th percentile (146 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 51st percentile (401 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 63rd percentile (14,350 lb)B · 54th percentile (12,860 lb)
A · Puma 145B · 9700Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 145Full spec pageFord 9700