Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 145
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 145 vs Massey Ferguson 8240
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 8240
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 145
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8240
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 145146 hp
8240146 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 145 is in the 55th percentile; 8240 is in the 55th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 145 higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 145411 ci
8240403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 145 is in the 60th percentile; 8240 is in the 54th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1456
82406
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 145 is in the 50th percentile; 8240 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedPuma 14518
824018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 145 is in the 61st percentile; 8240 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
Puma 145 (A)8240 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | Puma 145 | 8240 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Sisu | — |
| Power Output | 146hp | 146hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 403ci | ▲ Puma 145+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 8240+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Puma 145+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 61.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 14,350lb | 15,555lb | ▲ 8240+1,205 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20.8R42 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Three-point hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Electro-hydraulic wet disc | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated by two foot pedals that can be locked together | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | Massey Ferguson 8240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 55th percentile (146 hp)B · 55th percentile (146 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 54th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 63rd percentile (14,350 lb)B · 69th percentile (15,555 lb)
A · Puma 145B · 8240Median Row Crop Tractor