Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 145
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 145 vs New Holland T6050 Elite
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T6050 Elite
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 145
vs
New HollandNew Holland T6050 Elite
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 145146 hp
T6050 Elite146 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 145 is in the 55th percentile; T6050 Elite is in the 55th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 145411 ci
T6050 Elite411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 145 is in the 60th percentile; T6050 Elite is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1456
T6050 Elite6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 145 is in the 50th percentile; T6050 Elite is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 145 higher · +2 (+13%)Puma 14518
T6050 Elite16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 145 is in the 61st percentile; T6050 Elite is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Puma 145 (A)T6050 Elite (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 145 | T6050 Elite | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | CNH | — |
| Model | Not recorded | CNH series | — |
| Power Output | 146hp | 146hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 61.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 112in | — |
| Operating Weight | 14,350lb | 12,270lb | ▲ Puma 145+2,080 lb · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | 2/3N | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Electro-hydraulic wet disc | Wet disc, hydraulically actuated by two foot pedals | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 145 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 55th percentile (146 hp)B · 55th percentile (146 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 63rd percentile (14,350 lb)B · 50th percentile (12,270 lb)
A · Puma 145B · T6050 EliteMedian Row Crop Tractor