Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 150
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 150 vs Fendt 920 Vario
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 920 Vario
Row Crop
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150
vs
FendtFendt 920 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 920 Vario higher · +60 hp (+40%)Puma 150150 hp
920 Vario210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 150 is in the 57th percentile; 920 Vario is in the 79th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 920 Vario higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 150411 ci
920 Vario419 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 150 is in the 60th percentile; 920 Vario is in the 71st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1506
920 Vario6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 150 is in the 50th percentile; 920 Vario is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 920 Vario higher · +5,390 lb (+39%)Puma 15013,900 lb
920 Vario19,290 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 150 is in the 62nd percentile; 920 Vario is in the 82nd · 1,350 models
Puma 150 (A)920 Vario (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Puma 150 | 920 Vario | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | MAN | — |
| Model | Turbocharged with Air-to-Air Aftercooling Diesel | D0836 | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 210hp | ▲ 920 Vario+60 hp · +40% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,150RPM | ▲ Puma 150+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 419ci | ▲ 920 Vario+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 920 Vario+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ Puma 150+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 195in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 100in | — |
| Height | 118in | 122in | ▲ 920 Vario+4 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 13,900lb | 19,290lb | ▲ 920 Vario+5,390 lb · +39% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 2 | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 24,251lb | 30,865lb | ▲ 920 Vario+6,614 lb · +27% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 150 | Fendt 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 57th percentile (150 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 71st percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 62nd percentile (13,900 lb)B · 82nd percentile (19,290 lb)
Height
median 114 inA · 66th percentile (118 in)B · 77th percentile (122 in)
A · Puma 150B · 920 VarioMedian Row Crop Tractor