Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 150 vs Massey Ferguson 7150

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 150

Row Crop

power
150 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 150 specs
Massey Ferguson 7150 Tractor
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 7150

Row Crop

power
150 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
12
Full 7150 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 7150

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,140–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 150150 hp
7150150 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 150 is in the 57th percentile; 7150 is in the 57th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 150 higher · +8 ci (+2%)
Puma 150411 ci
7150403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 150 is in the 60th percentile; 7150 is in the 56th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1506
71506
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 150 is in the 50th percentile; 7150 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 150 higher · +6 (+50%)
Puma 15018
715012
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 150 is in the 61st percentile; 7150 is in the 27th · 1,200 models

Puma 150 (A)7150 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHMassey Ferguson—
ModelPuma 1507150—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
ManufacturerFPTAGCO SISU Power—
ModelTurbocharged with Air-to-Air Aftercooling Diesel620 DS—
Power Output150hp150hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci403ci▲ Puma 150+8 ci · +2%
Bore4.1inNot recorded—
Stroke5.2inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
TypeFull power shiftSynchromesh—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
LengthNot recorded200in—
Height118in124in▲ 7150+6 in · +5%
Operating Weight13,900lb18,190lb▲ 7150+4,290 lb · +31%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
System TypeClosed Center Pressure Flow CompensatingLoad sensing—
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
Hitch TypeRear Type IINot recorded—
Hitch CategoryCategory 2II—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity24,251lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive TypeMFWD 4WD4WD—
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic power—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 150Massey Ferguson 7150Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 57th percentile (150 hp)B · 57th percentile (150 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 56th percentile (403 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 27th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 62nd percentile (13,900 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,190 lb)
A · Puma 150B · 7150Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 150Full spec pageMassey Ferguson 7150