Head to head · Utility

CaseIH Puma 155 vs Ford 5000

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 155

Utility

power
155 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 155 specs
Ford 5000 Tractor
FordModel B

Ford 5000

Utility

power
69.1 hp
displacement
233 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
8
Full 5000 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 155
vs
FordFord 5000

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,321–5,720

Engine Power

▲ Puma 155 higher · +85.9 hp (+124%)
Puma 155155 hp
500069.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Puma 155 is in the 93rd percentile; 5000 is in the 62nd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 155 higher · +178 ci (+76%)
Puma 155411 ci
5000233 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Puma 155 is in the 91st percentile; 5000 is in the 63rd · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ Puma 155 higher · +2 (+50%)
Puma 1556
50004
Median Utility Tractor4

Puma 155 is in the 93rd percentile; 5000 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 155 higher · +10 (+125%)
Puma 15518
50008
Median Utility Tractor12

Puma 155 is in the 83rd percentile; 5000 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models

Puma 155 (A)5000 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHFord—
ModelPuma 1555000—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
ManufacturerCNHFord—
Power Output155hp69.1hp▲ Puma 155+85.9 hp · +124%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ Puma 155+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders64▲ Puma 155+2 · +50%
Displacement411ci233ci▲ Puma 155+178 ci · +76%
Bore4.1in4.2in▲ 5000+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.2in4.2in▲ Puma 155+1 in · +24%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
Type18-speed partial power shiftSliding gear—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
WidthNot recorded68.1in—
Height118in63.4in▲ Puma 155+54.6 in · +86%
Operating Weight14,585lbNot recorded—

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
System TypeClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC)Open center—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower assist—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch Category2/3NII/I—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4x4 MFWD 4WD2WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower assist—
Brake TypeNot recordedDifferential mechanical wet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
CoolantNot recorded3.8gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 155Ford 5000Difference
TypeCabOpen—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 93rd percentile (155 hp)B · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 91st percentile (411 ci)B · 63rd percentile (233 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 23rd percentile (8)

Height

median 94.1 in
A · 94th percentile (118 in)B · 12th percentile (63.4 in)
A · Puma 155B · 5000Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 155Full spec pageFord 5000