CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 165
Row Crop
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 165 vs Massey Ferguson 680
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 680
Row Crop
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 165
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 680
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 165165 hp
680165 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 165 is in the 65th percentile; 680 is in the 65th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 165 higher · +46 ci (+13%)Puma 165411 ci
680365 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 165 is in the 63rd percentile; 680 is in the 45th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1656
6806
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 165 is in the 50th percentile; 680 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 165 higher · +6 (+50%)Puma 16518
68012
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 165 is in the 61st percentile; 680 is in the 27th · 1,200 models
Puma 165 (A)680 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | Puma 165 | 680 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH / FPT | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1006.6T | — |
| Power Output | 165hp | 165hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 365ci | ▲ Puma 165+46 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ Puma 165+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 165+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 191in | — |
| Height | 120in | 117in | ▲ Puma 165+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 17,725lb | 14,054lb | ▲ Puma 165+3,671 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 16.9-30 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 20.8-42 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Massey Ferguson 680 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS / Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 65th percentile (165 hp)B · 65th percentile (165 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 45th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 76th percentile (17,725 lb)B · 62nd percentile (14,054 lb)
A · Puma 165B · 680Median Row Crop Tractor