Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 165 vs New Holland TM165

New Holland TM165 Tractor
New HollandModel B

New Holland TM165

Row Crop

power
165 hp
displacement
456 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full TM165 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 165
vs
New HollandNew Holland TM165

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 165165 hp
TM165165 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 165 is in the 65th percentile; TM165 is in the 65th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ TM165 higher · +45 ci (+11%)
Puma 165411 ci
TM165456 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 165 is in the 63rd percentile; TM165 is in the 80th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1656
TM1656
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 165 is in the 50th percentile; TM165 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Puma 16518
TM16518
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 165 is in the 61st percentile; TM165 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Puma 165 (A)TM165 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHNew Holland—
ModelPuma 165TM165—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
ManufacturerCNH / FPTNew Holland—
Power Output165hp165hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,300RPM▲ TM165+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci456ci▲ TM165+45 ci · +11%
Bore4.1in4.4in▲ TM165+0.3 in · +7%
Stroke5.2in5in▲ Puma 165+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
TypeFull power shiftSelective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator controlled powershift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
WidthNot recorded79.2in—
Height120inNot recorded—
Operating Weight17,725lb13,845lb▲ Puma 165+3,880 lb · +28%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensatingClosed center load sensing (CCLS)—
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded32.9gpm—
PressureNot recorded2,465psi—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Tires

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
Front Tire Size16.9-3016.9R28—
Rear Tire Size20.8-4220.8R38—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryII/IIINIII/II—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded8,455lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WD (front wheel assist)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
CoolantNot recorded6.9gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 165New Holland TM165Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 65th percentile (165 hp)B · 65th percentile (165 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 80th percentile (456 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 76th percentile (17,725 lb)B · 61st percentile (13,845 lb)
A · Puma 165B · TM165Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 165Full spec pageNew Holland TM165