CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 170
Row Crop
- power
- 167 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 170 vs New Holland T7.220
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7.220
Row Crop
- power
- 167 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 170
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7.220
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 170167 hp
T7.220167 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 170 is in the 66th percentile; T7.220 is in the 66th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 170411 ci
T7.220411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 170 is in the 60th percentile; T7.220 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1706
T7.2206
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 170 is in the 50th percentile; T7.220 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Puma 170 higher · +3,418 lb (+22%)Puma 17018,740 lb
T7.22015,322 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 170 is in the 81st percentile; T7.220 is in the 68th · 1,350 models
Puma 170 (A)T7.220 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 170 | T7.220 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | FPT | Same |
| Power Output | 167hp | 167hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 227in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 97.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 123in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,740lb | 15,322lb | ▲ Puma 170+3,418 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4 Wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | SCR | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland T7.220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 66th percentile (167 hp)B · 66th percentile (167 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 81st percentile (18,740 lb)B · 68th percentile (15,322 lb)
A · Puma 170B · T7.220Median Row Crop Tractor