Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 180 vs Massey Ferguson 7180

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 180

Row Crop

power
180 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
19
Full Puma 180 specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 7180

Row Crop

power
180 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
12
Full 7180 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 7180

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,140–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 180180 hp
7180180 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 180 is in the 70th percentile; 7180 is in the 70th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 180 higher · +8 ci (+2%)
Puma 180411 ci
7180403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 180 is in the 63rd percentile; 7180 is in the 56th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1806
71806
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 180 is in the 50th percentile; 7180 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 180 higher · +7 (+58%)
Puma 18019
718012
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 180 is in the 68th percentile; 7180 is in the 27th · 1,200 models

Puma 180 (A)7180 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHMassey Ferguson—
ModelPuma 1807180—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
ManufacturerCNHAGCO SISU Power—
ModelNot recorded620 DS—
Power Output180hp180hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci403ci▲ Puma 180+8 ci · +2%
Bore4.1inNot recorded—
Stroke5.2inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
TypeFull power shiftSynchromesh—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
LengthNot recorded200in—
Height123in124in▲ 7180+1 in · <1%
Operating Weight17,595lb21,430lb▲ 7180+3,835 lb · +22%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
System TypePressure flow compensating (PFC)Load sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
Hitch TypeRear Type: II/IIINThree-point hitch—
Hitch CategoryII/IIINII—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type2WD4WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 180Massey Ferguson 7180Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 70th percentile (180 hp)B · 70th percentile (180 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 56th percentile (403 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 68th percentile (19)B · 27th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 75th percentile (17,595 lb)B · 87th percentile (21,430 lb)
A · Puma 180B · 7180Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 180Full spec pageMassey Ferguson 7180