Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 185 vs John Deere 8210

Image not recorded
John DeereModel B

John Deere 8210

Row Crop

power
185 hp
displacement
496 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 8210 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 185
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8210

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 185185 hp
8210185 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 185 is in the 72nd percentile; 8210 is in the 72nd · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8210 higher · +85 ci (+21%)
Puma 185411 ci
8210496 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 185 is in the 60th percentile; 8210 is in the 85th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1856
82106
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 185 is in the 50th percentile; 8210 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 185 higher · +2 (+13%)
Puma 18518
821016
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 185 is in the 61st percentile; 8210 is in the 50th · 1,200 models

Puma 185 (A)8210 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHJohn Deere—
ModelPuma 1858210—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
ManufacturerFPTJohn Deere—
Power Output185hp185hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci496ci▲ 8210+85 ci · +21%
Bore4.1in4.6in▲ 8210+0.5 in · +12%
Stroke5.2in5.1in▲ Puma 185+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
Type18-speed full power shiftPower Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
Operating Weight18,135lb17,897lb▲ Puma 185+238 lb · +1%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent Rear PTO—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Tread Width

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
Front Tread Width60inNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
Hitch TypeType 2/3NThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded10,400lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—
Brake TypeNot recordedDisc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
CoolantNot recorded9gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 185John Deere 8210Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 72nd percentile (185 hp)B · 72nd percentile (185 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 85th percentile (496 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (18,135 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,897 lb)
A · Puma 185B · 8210Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 185Full spec pageJohn Deere 8210