CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 185
Row Crop
- power
- 185 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 185 vs Massey Ferguson 7719
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 7719
Row Crop
- power
- 185 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 185
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 7719
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 185185 hp
7719185 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 185 is in the 72nd percentile; 7719 is in the 71st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 185 higher · +9 ci (+2%)Puma 185411 ci
7719402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 185 is in the 60th percentile; 7719 is in the 52nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1856
77196
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 185 is in the 50th percentile; 7719 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7719 higher · +45 lb (<1%)Puma 18518,135 lb
771918,180 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 185 is in the 78th percentile; 7719 is in the 79th · 1,350 models
Puma 185 (A)7719 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | Puma 185 | 7719 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 473684 | — |
| Power Output | 185hp | 185hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 185+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 402ci | ▲ Puma 185+9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 7719+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Puma 185+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed full power shift | CVT (Dyna-VT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 18,135lb | 18,180lb | ▲ 7719+45 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 29.2gpm | — |
| Pressure | Not recorded | 1,990psi | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/70R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 620/70R42 | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 60in | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type 2/3N | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 13,890lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7719 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 72nd percentile (185 hp)B · 71st percentile (185 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 78th percentile (18,135 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,180 lb)
A · Puma 185B · 7719Median Row Crop Tractor