Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 185 vs New Holland T7.235

Image not recorded
New HollandModel B

New Holland T7.235

Row Crop

power
185 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full T7.235 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 185
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7.235

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 185185 hp
T7.235185 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 185 is in the 72nd percentile; T7.235 is in the 72nd · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
Puma 185411 ci
T7.235411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 185 is in the 60th percentile; T7.235 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1856
T7.2356
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 185 is in the 50th percentile; T7.235 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Puma 18518
T7.23518
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 185 is in the 61st percentile; T7.235 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Puma 185 (A)T7.235 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHNew Holland—
ModelPuma 185T7.235—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
ManufacturerFPTFPTSame
Power Output185hp185hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci411ciSame
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
Type18-speed full power shiftFull power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
LengthNot recorded227in—
WidthNot recorded97.2in—
HeightNot recorded123in—
Operating Weight18,135lb15,322lb▲ Puma 185+2,813 lb · +18%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed center load sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Tread Width

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
Front Tread Width60inNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
Hitch TypeType 2/3NNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII/II—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WDMFWD 4WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7.235Difference
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 72nd percentile (185 hp)B · 72nd percentile (185 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (18,135 lb)B · 68th percentile (15,322 lb)
A · Puma 185B · T7.235Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 185Full spec pageNew Holland T7.235