Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 210 vs Ford 8870

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 210

Row Crop

power
210 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 210 specs
Ford 8870 Tractor
FordModel B

Ford 8870

Row Crop

power
210 hp
displacement
456 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 8870 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210
vs
FordFord 8870

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,140–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 210210 hp
8870210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 210 is in the 79th percentile; 8870 is in the 79th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8870 higher · +45 ci (+11%)
Puma 210411 ci
8870456 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 210 is in the 63rd percentile; 8870 is in the 80th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2106
88706
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 210 is in the 50th percentile; 8870 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 210 higher · +2 (+13%)
Puma 21018
887016
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 210 is in the 61st percentile; 8870 is in the 50th · 1,200 models

Puma 210 (A)8870 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHFord—
ModelPuma 2108870—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
ManufacturerCNHFord—
ModelNot recordedFord—
Power Output210hp210hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ Puma 210+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci456ci▲ 8870+45 ci · +11%
Bore4.1in4.4in▲ 8870+0.3 in · +7%
Stroke5.2in5in▲ Puma 210+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
LengthNot recorded197in—
WidthNot recorded96.7in—
Height120in121in▲ 8870+1 in · <1%
Operating Weight17,915lb16,700lb▲ Puma 210+1,215 lb · +7%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
System TypePressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed center load sensing (CCLS)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded1,000rpm—

Tires

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded14L-16.1—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded18.4R42—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
Hitch TypeRear: II/IIINThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryCategory 3Category 3Same
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded12,500lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame
Brake TypeNot recordedWet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
CoolantNot recorded6.6gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Ford 8870Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 79th percentile (210 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 80th percentile (456 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)B · 72nd percentile (16,700 lb)
A · Puma 210B · 8870Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 210Full spec pageFord 8870