Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 210
Row Crop
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 210 vs New Holland TG210
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TG210
Row Crop
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210
vs
New HollandNew Holland TG210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 210210 hp
TG210210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 210 is in the 79th percentile; TG210 is in the 79th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TG210 higher · +94 ci (+23%)Puma 210411 ci
TG210505 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 210 is in the 63rd percentile; TG210 is in the 89th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2106
TG2106
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 210 is in the 50th percentile; TG210 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedPuma 21018
TG21018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 210 is in the 61st percentile; TG210 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
Puma 210 (A)TG210 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 210 | TG210 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | CDC | — |
| Power Output | 210hp | 210hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 505ci | ▲ TG210+94 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.5in | ▲ TG210+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.3in | ▲ TG210+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,915lb | 20,455lb | ▲ TG210+2,540 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear: II/IIIN | Category III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland TG210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 79th percentile (210 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 89th percentile (505 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)B · 85th percentile (20,455 lb)
A · Puma 210B · TG210Median Row Crop Tractor