Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 225
Agricultural
- power
- 225 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
CaseIH Puma 225 vs Fendt Favorit 824
FendtModel B
Fendt Favorit 824
Agricultural
- power
- 230 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 44
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 225
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 824
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ Favorit 824 higher · +5 hp (+2%)Puma 225225 hp
Favorit 824230 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
Puma 225 is in the 84th percentile; Favorit 824 is in the 85th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Favorit 824 higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 225411 ci
Favorit 824419 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
Puma 225 is in the 70th percentile; Favorit 824 is in the 74th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2256
Favorit 8246
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
Puma 225 is in the 74th percentile; Favorit 824 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ Favorit 824 higher · +897 lb (+5%)Puma 22516,500 lb
Favorit 82417,397 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
Puma 225 is in the 75th percentile; Favorit 824 is in the 77th · 971 models
Puma 225 (A)Favorit 824 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Puma 225 | Favorit 824 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | MAN | — |
| Model | 24-valve | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 225hp | 230hp | ▲ Favorit 824+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Favorit 824+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 419ci | ▲ Favorit 824+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ Favorit 824+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ Puma 225+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 194in | — |
| Height | 123in | 122in | ▲ Puma 225+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 17,397lb | ▲ Favorit 824+897 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | Fendt Favorit 824 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 84th percentile (225 hp)B · 85th percentile (230 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 70th percentile (411 ci)B · 74th percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 75th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,397 lb)
Height
median 111 inA · 81st percentile (123 in)B · 81st percentile (122 in)
A · Puma 225B · Favorit 824Median Agricultural Tractor