Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 225
Agricultural
- power
- 225 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
CaseIH Puma 225 vs John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp
John DeereModel B
John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp
Agricultural
- power
- 225 hp
- displacement
- 549 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 225
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8130 180 PTO hp
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 225225 hp
8130 180 PTO hp225 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
Puma 225 is in the 84th percentile; 8130 180 PTO hp is in the 84th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8130 180 PTO hp higher · +138 ci (+34%)Puma 225411 ci
8130 180 PTO hp549 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
Puma 225 is in the 70th percentile; 8130 180 PTO hp is in the 90th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2256
8130 180 PTO hp6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
Puma 225 is in the 74th percentile; 8130 180 PTO hp is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Puma 225 (A)8130 180 PTO hp (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Puma 225 | 8130 180 PTO hp | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 24-valve | 2240 | — |
| Power Output | 225hp | 225hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 225+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 549ci | ▲ 8130 180 PTO hp+138 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 123in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | 2/3N | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 12,401lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 180 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 84th percentile (225 hp)B · 84th percentile (225 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 70th percentile (411 ci)B · 90th percentile (549 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
A · Puma 225B · 8130 180 PTO hpMedian Agricultural Tractor