Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 230 vs Fendt Favorit 924 Vario

CaseIH Puma 230 Tractor
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 230

Row Crop

power
231 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Puma 230 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 230
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 924 Vario

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,206–1,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 230 higher · +1 hp (<1%)
Puma 230231 hp
Favorit 924 Vario230 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 230 is in the 84th percentile; Favorit 924 Vario is in the 84th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Favorit 924 Vario higher · +8 ci (+2%)
Puma 230411 ci
Favorit 924 Vario419 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 230 is in the 63rd percentile; Favorit 924 Vario is in the 71st · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2306
Favorit 924 Vario6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 230 is in the 50th percentile; Favorit 924 Vario is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ Puma 230 higher · +1,742 lb (+10%)
Puma 23019,800 lb
Favorit 924 Vario18,058 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

Puma 230 is in the 84th percentile; Favorit 924 Vario is in the 78th · 1,350 models

Puma 230 (A)Favorit 924 Vario (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 230Fendt Favorit 924 VarioDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHFendt—
ModelPuma 230Favorit 924 Vario—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 230Fendt Favorit 924 VarioDifference
ManufacturerFPTMAN—
Power Output231hp230hp▲ Puma 230+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,300RPM▲ Favorit 924 Vario+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci419ci▲ Favorit 924 Vario+8 ci · +2%
Bore4.1in4.3in▲ Favorit 924 Vario+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke5.2in4.9in▲ Puma 230+0.3 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 230Fendt Favorit 924 VarioDifference
TypeContinuously variable transmission (CVT)Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)Same

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 230Fendt Favorit 924 VarioDifference
LengthNot recorded194in—
HeightNot recorded122in—
Operating Weight19,800lb18,058lb▲ Puma 230+1,742 lb · +10%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 230Fendt Favorit 924 VarioDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Not recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 230Fendt Favorit 924 VarioDifference
Hitch TypeRear Type: 2/3NNot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 230Fendt Favorit 924 VarioDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 230Fendt Favorit 924 VarioDifference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 84th percentile (231 hp)B · 84th percentile (230 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 71st percentile (419 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 84th percentile (19,800 lb)B · 78th percentile (18,058 lb)
A · Puma 230B · Favorit 924 VarioMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 230Full spec pageFendt Favorit 924 Vario