CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 230
Row Crop
- power
- 231 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 230 vs New Holland TG230
New HollandModel B
New Holland TG230
Row Crop
- power
- 230 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 230
vs
New HollandNew Holland TG230
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 230 higher · +1 hp (<1%)Puma 230231 hp
TG230230 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 230 is in the 84th percentile; TG230 is in the 84th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TG230 higher · +94 ci (+23%)Puma 230411 ci
TG230505 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 230 is in the 63rd percentile; TG230 is in the 89th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2306
TG2306
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 230 is in the 50th percentile; TG230 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ TG230 higher · +540 lb (+3%)Puma 23019,800 lb
TG23020,340 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 230 is in the 84th percentile; TG230 is in the 85th · 1,350 models
Puma 230 (A)TG230 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland TG230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 230 | TG230 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland TG230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | CDC | — |
| Power Output | 231hp | 230hp | ▲ Puma 230+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 505ci | ▲ TG230+94 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.5in | ▲ TG230+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.3in | ▲ TG230+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland TG230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland TG230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 19,800lb | 20,340lb | ▲ TG230+540 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland TG230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland TG230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: 2/3N | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland TG230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland TG230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 84th percentile (231 hp)B · 84th percentile (230 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 89th percentile (505 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,800 lb)B · 85th percentile (20,340 lb)
A · Puma 230B · TG230Median Row Crop Tractor