Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 240 vs John Deere 8130

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 240

Row Crop

power
240 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 240 specs
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B

John Deere 8130

Row Crop

power
240 hp
displacement
548 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 8130 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8130

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 240240 hp
8130240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; 8130 is in the 86th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8130 higher · +137 ci (+33%)
Puma 240411 ci
8130548 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; 8130 is in the 96th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2406
81306
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; 8130 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 240 higher · +2 (+13%)
Puma 24018
813016
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 240 is in the 61st percentile; 8130 is in the 50th · 1,200 models

Puma 240 (A)8130 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHJohn Deere—
ModelPuma 2408130—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
ManufacturerFPTJohn Deere—
ModelNot recordedPowerTech—
Power Output240hp240hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ Puma 240+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci548ci▲ 8130+137 ci · +33%
Bore4.1in4.7in▲ 8130+0.6 in · +15%
Stroke5.2in5.4in▲ 8130+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
LengthNot recorded219in—
HeightNot recorded123in—
Operating Weight16,800lb21,782lb▲ 8130+4,982 lb · +30%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
System TypeOpen center pressure flow compensatingClosed center PFC—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch Category3III/IIIN—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded12,405lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeNot recordedWet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
CoolantNot recorded10.6gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 240John Deere 8130Difference
TypeNot recordedCommandView cab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 96th percentile (548 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 88th percentile (21,782 lb)
A · Puma 240B · 8130Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 240Full spec pageJohn Deere 8130