Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 240 vs Massey Ferguson 8650

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 240

Row Crop

power
240 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 240 specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 8650

Row Crop

power
240 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 8650 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8650

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,206–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 240240 hp
8650240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; 8650 is in the 86th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8650 higher · +102 ci (+25%)
Puma 240411 ci
8650513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; 8650 is in the 92nd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2406
86506
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; 8650 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ 8650 higher · +8,400 lb (+50%)
Puma 24016,800 lb
865025,200 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

Puma 240 is in the 73rd percentile; 8650 is in the 94th · 1,350 models

Puma 240 (A)8650 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHMassey Ferguson—
ModelPuma 2408650—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
ManufacturerFPTSisu Diesel—
ModelNot recordedT00767—
Power Output240hp240hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ Puma 240+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci513ci▲ 8650+102 ci · +25%
Bore4.1in4.4in▲ 8650+0.3 in · +7%
Stroke5.2in5.7in▲ 8650+0.5 in · +10%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
TypeFull power shiftContinuously variable transmission (CVT)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
LengthNot recorded223in—
HeightNot recorded133in—
Operating Weight16,800lb25,200lb▲ 8650+8,400 lb · +50%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
System TypeOpen center pressure flow compensatingDirect engine drive—
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded49.5gpm—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent with electro-hydraulic clutch—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch Category3Not recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Massey Ferguson 8650Difference
TypeNot recordedCab with heat and air-conditioning—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 92nd percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 94th percentile (25,200 lb)
A · Puma 240B · 8650Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 240Full spec pageMassey Ferguson 8650